Current Topics

References

Turkey Flat, USA Site-Effects Test Area Published Papers/Abstracts
 

Cramer, C.H., 1995, Weak-Motion Observations and Modeling for the Turkey Flat, U.S., Site Effects Test Area near Parkfield, California: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v.85, p. 440-451.

Field, E.H. and K.H. Jacob, 1993, Monte-Carlo Simulation of the Theoretical Site Response Variability at Turkey Flat, California, Given the Uncertainty in the Geotechnically Derived Input Parameters: Earthquake Spectra, v. 9, p.669-702.

Cramer, C.H. and C.R. Real, 1992, A Statistical Analysis of Submitted Site-Effects Predictions For The Weak-Motion Blind Prediction Test Conducted At The Turkey Flat, USA, Site Effects Test Area Near Parkfield, California. Proceedings of the International Symposium On The Effects Of Surface Geology On Seismic Motion, Odawara City, Japan, V. 2, p. 15-20.

Real, C.R. and C.H. Cramer, 1990, Turkey Flat, USA, Site Effects Test Area: "Blind" Test of Weak-Motion Soil Response Prediction: Proceedings of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, v. 1, p. 535-544.

Cramer, C.H. and C.R. Real, 1990, Ground Response to Weak Motions From Local and Regional Earthquakes at The Turkey Flat Site-Effects Test Area Near Parkfield, CA: Observations, Modeling, and Implications for Ground Motion Prediction: Seismological Research Letters, V. 61, n. 1, p 51.

Cramer, C.H., C.R. Real, and B.E. Tucker, 1989, The Weak-Motion Test of The Ground-Motion Prediction Phase of The Turkey Flat, USA, Site Effects Test Area Experiment: Seismological Research Letters, v. 60, n. 1, p. 8.

Tucker, B.E., C.R. Real, and P.Y. Bard, 1988, Validation Des Methodes De Prediction Des Effets De Site: L'Experience De Turkey Flat En Californie Centrale: 3.44﷓3.51.

Real, C.R. and B.E. Tucker, 1988, Ground Motion Site Effects Test Area Near Parkfield, California: Proceedings of the Sino-American Workshop on Strong-Motion Measurement, p. 140-147.

Real, C.R. and B.E. Tucker, 1988, Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area site characteristics: Proceedings of the IASPEI/IAEE Joint Working Group on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion Second Workshop, Tokyo Japan, 1﷓22.

Real, C.R. and B.E. Tucker, 1988, Ground Motion Site Effects Test Area Near Parkfield, California: Proceedings Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, v. VIII, p. 187-191.

Tucker, B.E. and C.R. Real, 1988, The Design and Operation of a Test﷓Site Near Parkfield, California to Compare and Test Methods of Estimating the Effect of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, in, Proceedings: Earthquake Ground-Motion Estimation in Eastern North America: Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI NP﷓5875, Chapter 15, p. 1-15.

Kaneko, F., H. Ohtomo, K. Tonouchi, and C.R. Real, 1987, Geotechnical Investigation for the Purpose of Forecasting of Seismic Motion in Parkfield: Seismological Society of Japan.

Real, C.R. and B.E. Tucker, 1987, Ground Motion Site Effects Test Area at Turkey Flat, California: EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, v. 68, p. 1350.

Project Technical Reports

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 1: Needs, Goals, and Objectives. TR 86-1, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 2: Site Characterization. TR 88-2, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 3: Weak-Motion Test: Prediction Criteria and Input Rock Motions. TR 89-1, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 4: Weak-Motion Test: Observed Seismic Response. TR 90-1, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 5: Weak Motion Test: Statistical Analysis of Submitted Predictions and comparisons to Observations. TR 90-2, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 6: Weak-Motion Test: Observations and Modeling. TR 91-1, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area – Report 7: Strong-Motion Test: Prediction Criteria and Data Formats. California Geological Survey.

IASPEI/IAEE Joint Working Group on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Proceedings of the IASPEI/IAEE Joint Working Group on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion Workshop. XIX Assembly, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, August 12-13, 1987, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

Proceedings of Proceedings of the IASPEI/IAEE Joint Working Group on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion Second Workshop. Japanese Working Group on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, August 1, 1988, Tokyo, Japan.

Proceedings of the International Symposium on The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion: IASPEI/IAEE Joint Working Group on ESG, Japanese National Working Group on ESG, March 25-27, 1992, Odawara, Japan.

Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Yokohama, Japan, 1-3 December 1998. A.A. Balkerna/Rotterdam/Brookfield.