Welcome to California - images of Golden Gate Bridge, ocean sunset, waterfall, flowers, and city skyline
Department of Conservation
California Geological Survey
  Turkey Flat Main Page
  Contacts
  Steering Committee
  Contributors
  Strong-motion Test - Registration
  References
  Links
About Us
Contact Us
Jobs
Site Map
Help/FAQ
Other Resources
  OES Earthquake Program
  Caltrans Office of Earthquake Engineering
  OSHPD Seismic Retrofit Program
  Seismic Safety Commission
  State Architect
  US Geological Survey
  Earthquake Engineering Research Institute


California Department of Conservation logo

 

Current Topics

  Turkey Flat Blind Prediction
   

Weak-Motion Test

During 1989-1990, a “Blind” Weak-Motion Test was conducted at the Turkey Flat, USA Site Effects Test Area as part of the long-term experiment plan.  For 18 months prior to the weak-motion test, the California Geological Survey teamed with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to record weak ground motions across the Turkey Flat array. Weak-motion sensors were co-located at each of the strong-motion recording sites, and provided the data necessary to conduct the blind test.  The purpose of the weak-motion test was threefold, to provide:

  • A means of setting up and testing prediction models and procedures for readiness when a strong-motion event occurs;

  • An opportunity to compare very low strain ground motion predictions and observations with those at high levels of strain; and,

  • A means of validating how well dynamic soil characteristics have been estimated throughout the test site.

Principal findings from the weak-motion test are:

  • All predictions tend to group, and are successful in that the observed ground motions fall within the range of prediction uncertainties. The uncertainty, however, is large;

  • Damping in the “standard” geotechnical model may be too low, suggesting the accuracy of the site characterization is more important than the method used to calculate response; and,

  • There was a tendency to underestimate uncertainty of predictions.

Details of the weak-motion test results may be of value in the strong-motion test, and are available in the following publications:

(Cramer, 1995)

(Field and Jacob, 1993)

(Turkey Flat Report 6, 1991)

(Turkey Flat Report 5, 1990)

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Back to Top of Page